step 1. Yet ,, inside family history, we knowthat for every code there was an exception. An excellent vexing section ofgenealogy is that not one person very knows just how to utilize this new exceptions orrules having people decisive adjective such as for example constantly, perhaps, probably,most likely, etc. It will be fascinating in the event that around most other examples ofjointures are made a-year otherwise a couple of once a well-known matrimony go out.
dos. Can there be an extant dispensation on matrimony of ElizabethClifford and you may Sir Ralph Bowes who have been third cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh otherwise last cousins, shortly after taken from the latest 5th LordClifford? Who would restrict its wedding go out.
Arthur
Allegedly, if the a dispensation is actually tried and you may offered, it would havebeen from the one of the following, that can are available in the fresh new correspondingregister book, whether it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop regarding York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop regarding York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop off Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop regarding Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop from Carlisle 1509-1520
5. Should your 10th Lord Clifford do get married during the early 1487 [state January] andhas E later because year, really does the fresh chronology not functions?
John possession?
Age created in late 1487, Henry created from inside the 1488/nine, Joan within the ,etcetera. filling in the newest names of your posting from . When the (a) thechronology however works; and you can (b) their own wedding piece was not reasonable; thenwe have only the newest 1505 pedigree out-of Henry VII’s that’s inside oppositionto the fresh new supposition one she is actually a valid daughter.
six. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Could be the Clifford daughters the brand new onlyknown Henry VII relations excluded? Were there someone else? Therefore,wouldn’t one reflect badly about this document because the a source?
Out of contrasting I’ve produced from brand new c.1505 Henry VII Connections pedigreeswith brand new 1480-1500 Visitation of your Northern pedigrees, which can be
Throughout the c.1505 Relationships pedigrees, new Clifford youngsters are maybe not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but rather on St. John pedigree. Since I’mnot regularly the St. John family unit members, following the ‘s the information asit seems on c.1505 pedigree, due to the fact taken from the latest 1834 Coll. Best. etGen. blog post. The fresh phrasing in quotations is precisely since it appears inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).
« Zero. XII. »From my personal Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other. »f.288, 296, 317, 318. »Margaret Duchess away from Somerset got three husbands. » Of the « John Duke ofSomerset » she had « My personal Lady the brand new King’s Mom. » that has « The fresh new King. » whohad « Prince « By the « Sir Oliver Saint John, basic husband. » she had step three daus & 2 sons:
A. « Edith, wedded so you can Geoffrey Pole from Buckinghamshire. » That they had:A1. « Sir Richard Rod, Knt. married to the Woman Margaret, dau. from theDuke away from Clarence. » That they had: « Harry. « A2. « Alianor kissbrides.com varfГ¶r inte titta hГ¤r, married to Ralph Verney, Esq. » They had: « John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[yet another child, unnamed]. »
B. « John Ssint John, esq. » He’d five children:B1. « Sir John Saint John, Knight. » that has « Four daughters and you can oneson. »B2. « Anne, wedd. so you can Harry Lord Clifford. » They had « Jane. Mabill.Henry, son and you may heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor. »B3. « Elizabeth, wedded so you can Thomas Kent, Esq. from Lincolnshire. »B4. « A good Nun regarding Shaftesbury. »B5. « Oliver Saint John. »
C. « Dame Mary, married so you can Sir Richard Frognall. » They’d:C1. « Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and sistren. » With issueindicated, however entitled.C2. « Elizabeth, wedded so you’re able to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt. »
D. « Elizabeth, married earliest towards the Lord Zouche; shortly after to the LordScrope from Bolton. » Issue:D1. [by Zouche] » Catesby. » That they had: »Age. George. John. William. »D2. [by the Scrope] » Conyers. » With issueindicated yet not named.
Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset, by « Lionel Lord Welles, history spouse. »had: « John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. out of K. Edward IV. » andthey had « Age. »